I've been thinking, and have found some key concepts to the discussion at this point in time.
Ambiguity of Game Rules:
As discusses previously. Addresses Kohlberg's methods quite nicely.
Rule -Lawering:
The method by which players argue and come to agreements on how a game is to be played. The intention of the rules are argued with a players exploitation on the rules. Through ambiguity, debate can arise. Ie: "At x you must do a good act". Debate ensues on what is 'good'.
Moral reasoning v. Moral attitudes
A key to this project is finding core values and how to discuss them. Moral reasoning is the method by which situations are assessed. Moral attitudes are a result. They are more concrete, black/white and more subject to conflicting with others. But by assessing moral reasoning and debating the process, a healthier discussion arises that can result in a change of process.
Moral attitudes: What made you do that
Moral reasoning: Why did decide to do that.
Principal of Justice:
Kohlberg decided to base his moral dilemmas around the principal of justice. Justice is quite a debated topic, and brings forward different methods of treating right/wrong. Revenge, compassion, laws/rules.
Saturday, May 1, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment